美学家漫画像

作者为华远

作于1995年5月

油画《又一年早春》作者华远

美学家漫画像a——一位诺贝尔奖获得者，其成果揭示了美的客观本质 作者为华远

也许是无意中的世界焦点，

因为他天生就揭示了人类远古之谜。

人的本质不崇高但很自然（动物——天然形式b），

动物和人之别，虽可笑，但很必要（平衡——人为形式c），

时空定位良性循环参照下整体性与简洁性矛盾统一的信息中介即美的本质d——为了画圆(华远)。

他勇敢但更胆怯，虽说是科学研究，

但也想得到非理性的平衡，因为他不是美男。

所以他只会说：“我想到了，我只想到了……”

想到了传说中的孔明和周瑜之争；

想到了现今美容服饰和伦理道德；

想到了人类战争起源和绿色和平；

也想到了人类的灰色进步和人类的自我异化；

更想到了五彩花丛e中飞舞的本能的只会嗡嗡嗡的蜜蜂们。

作于1995年5月

注释与说明：

A.美学家漫画像：此稿以“顺口溜”的形式说出了美的本质最终揭示的核心观点，也道明了美本质最终揭示过程中遇到的尴尬和艰辛。1989年开始向国内外相关专家、学者和政界名人邮寄了与美的本质研究相关的稿件及其相关资料，现在此稿件和所有相关资料的复印件还保存完好，包括项目的手写稿件和相关通讯信件。本诗歌写于1995年5月，这个时间点正处在环境生态美学出场的时期。二十世纪九十年代环境生态美学的出场，也标志着人类绝对中心主义的离场。过于人为中心的观念是主体的感性的存在，这样推导下去是个人局部的碎片。

B.天然形式或信息中介：华远科学性美学美本质论体系中的一种审美形态，指人类未改造或稍加调整的自然形式或信息中介。稍加调整也就是人类遵循自然规律，按其自然精神适当地简化提炼，使原始自然更有利于人们的观赏和自然的可持续发展，因为人本来也属于自然的一部分，所以，天然形式或信息中介有些层面是不以人的意志为转移的，某些层面的审美不是以人为中心来参照的，这里指的是某些层面。

C.人为形式或人为信息中介：人为形式包括物质实体性人为形式和虚化的精神层面的类似形式的人为信息中介两大类，它抽象于自然的形式，人为地应用到自然景物、人造产品和艺术创作以及积淀塑造在人类心灵层面的精神信息。宇宙本来只有两个东西，一个是能量，一个是信息，其中信息同时可以统归为能量，信息可以说是能量的一种排列组合的侧面显现，它可以形象地说是能量的管理者。美、美的事物、美感归根到底都是一种信息中介，不论天然的，还是人为的形式或信息中介，终究都落脚于信息这个概念上，人为形式或人为信息中介也就是利用天然的形式和信息中介的规律性来修复、改善、提纯和创造人为的形式或信息中介。

D.美的本质：美的概念和美的本质是三定和六位一体的综合，是“时空定位”“良性循环”“整体性”“简洁性”“信息”“中介”六个关键词的综合，离开了以上六个关键词的任何一个限定和参照，事物的美丑将难以判断，因为六个关键词的关系是乘法关系。“良性循环”不等于“良性”，良性循环的重心侧重在“循环”这个词上，相比而言良性循环更有系统性和长远性的意味，良性循环就类似射击瞄准时看到的十字架外的视野圈，它是事物美的判断中的“定位”、“定性”、“定量”三定中的“定性”这一关键一环。

E.五彩花丛：你能说自然造化的多姿多彩的花朵们不美吗，它们为何色彩不同，造型各异呢？美本质的最终揭示不仅要研究人类、人类社会包括人类社会的广义和狭义艺术在内，还要把研究深入到自然的深处。

F.在此介绍一下关于美学界的“三大类”、“五大派”的统一的情况：首先谈一谈关于当代美学“三大类”的统一，先概括一下国内美学的“三大类”分法，第一类是哲学类美学——包括生活、生命、生态、生理、心理、存在、实践、后实践、实用、身体、后人类、马克思主义等美学，其中的哲学类美学的代表人物有李泽厚、蒋孔阳、周来祥、潘知常、朱立元、汝信、刘悦笛、曾繁仁等先生；第二类是文艺类美学——包括意象、境象、境界、修辞语言等美学，首提文艺美学这个概念是王梦欧、李长之、胡经之等先生，其中文艺美学的代表人物有王国维、蔡仪、王朝闻、朱光潜、宗白华、叶朗、王一川、徐碧辉、彭锋等先生；第三类是科学、科技与设计类美学——包括科学、技术、设计、商业、网络媒体等美学，其中程树德、钱穆、蔡仪、杨佐龙、徐纪敏、李志宏、梁思成、柳冠中、王受之、涂途、杭间、梁梅等先生是科学、科技与设计类美学的代表。这种三分法是根据我国的美学实践的实际来划分的，有不足的地方，但总体上是合理的。“三大类”美学能否统一？这种三分法不仅仅只适用于国内，虽说国外情况有不同细分的层面，但整体框架上大同小异，因为已进入信息时代的人类社会的美学学科已成为一门全球性的人文科学。定位广义艺术层面“三大类”美学的本身就是科学美的研究对象或一种广义艺术的审美对象，也是一种学科层面的定位和有序性参照，对“三大类”美学的科学美的审美把握也是要遵循真正科学性美学美论的定位、定性、定量这三定模式来评定来判断的。华远科学性美学认为只有真正把握了千古之谜的美的本质问题，找到了审美对象、美的事物和美感及相关“三大类”美学共同的“发源地”，不忘记具体美学的特色特质，存异求同，以上“三大类”分法就能统一在真正科学性美学的旗帜下，这样美的事业、美学之路会越走越宽广。虽说西医有局部把握、精准治疗的方法，但中医也有整体把握、平衡调理的优势。美学学科自十九世纪以来的发散研究有必要，问题是，近些年来的美学回归和高层面的综合也许更重要，美学同其他科学研究一样，分的时候要分，合的时候要合，这就是我们常说的科研中的分析与综合，这也是科学在分门别类基础上的实证和推论。在此要强调一点，无功利的功利性的有精神层面文明倾向，有明确功利的功利性是物质文明的倾向。世上没有无目的无功利的事物，只有精神和物质等区分下的事物下的目的性和功利性。哲学类美学有方法论的反思性、选择性、导向性倾向，文艺类美学有主体虚拟、美感超越、精神文明层面的倾向，科学、科技与设计类美学有客体理性、框架本体、物质文明层面的倾向。科学性美学美论就是对以上“三大类”之类的自下而上的综合和经验层面上的更高层次的抽象，科学性美本质论统摄了哲学类美学，文艺类美学，科学科技设计类美学这三大类关于美本质的探讨的观点，也包容了红色的革命的广义艺术人为理性美，蓝色的狭义艺术人为感性美和绿色的人文的自然美三大艺术实践层面的关于美本质的探索的经验。“难得糊涂”是不是也要一分为二来看？我们并不反对有些地方是要难得糊涂的，我们反对的是不能就此要恶性地把美的事物、审美对象、美的本质和美感、主观和客观等等之类也一股脑儿的全都难得糊涂了。美感对应于价值,价值和美感又在寻找着美的本质、美的事物和审美对象。现存的、一边倒向美感心理研究的美学是导致美学现象、美学实践难于科学把握和大众媒体常说的艺术作品越来越“丑”的原因,通俗地说美学也是研究美化人类物质和人类精神生活的科学,忘记了物质层面的审美对象、美的事物之类的这些最根本的目标这个基础,美学还有什么社会价值和意义呢？就是生命层面的美也可归类于自然美范畴来研究，生命是自然部分，也是物质文明一部分。

再来谈一谈“五大派”统一的问题，旧三论的代表人物香农提出的信息论有时可以类比美学中的有些机械的蔡仪的典型论，把不间断的，有无数细微亮度或档次变化的微调开关变成了不是1就是0的开与关，与信息论关联的典型论档次太少，具体性、针对性、精准性不强，再说有关“荣辱观”、“审美观”的一些主体实践倾向性的一些概念是蔡仪代表的典型美论难于兼容和良性自圆其说的，不过它在粗线条的广告，大型活动，舆论宣传中是一个很实用的方法论。网上有朋友粗略地看了作者的新媒体的几篇稿子后认为，这是蔡仪的美学理论。蔡仪的观点不正确，他的是机械唯物论的观点。本书本多媒体作者是这样回答的：科学性美学美论的关键词“时空定位”可以定位到主体、客体、主客统一体、整体、局部以及精神与物质等四维多层多线的审美实践的过程中，科学性美学美论的落脚词是定位、定性、定量前提下的信息中介，信息中介也包含了可深入到大脑的人的思维、感受和体验那些生物电为载体的信息中介的精神层面。比如说文艺美学类强调的“意向”就包括其中，只就能定位到人类大脑内部的形式层面来谈，格式塔心理学或完形心理学与科学性美论的定量层面的整体性与简洁性的信息中介的定量标准的规律性是一脉相承的，它也反过来证明了科学性美论在审美心理层面具有相对应的统摄力和兼容力，也证明了它在审美心理层面的合理性、正确性。蔡仪的典型美论有机械的一些方面，但相比而言他的理论基础是正确的，他的理路路径有其可取之处。再说朱光潜教授的有些标签化的主客统一美论是值得我们再拿出来反复推敲的，中国美学五大派只有团结在科学性美学的周围，才能让我们的中华美学，以科学的存在，逻辑的存在，自然直觉的存在呈现于世，这样才能让实践和理论统一基础上的科学性美论走向世界，贡献全人类。“三定六位一体”的科学性美学美论的美本质概念兼容和超越了国内包括国外在内的现当代学界的五大派美本质论，包括朱光潜的主客统一论、李泽厚的实践论、高尔泰的主观论、潘知常的生命论、蔡仪的典型论。

其实美本质的主观论者也有其自圆其说的相对的理由，虽说不太全面和整体。美学界的主观本质论认为美是一种主观感受，不存在客观的美本质。其理由包括：第一，美是个人主观感受。美的体验是因为我们对事物的感受，而这种感受因人而异，所以美本质不是客观存在的，而是因人而异的主观体验。第二，美是文化、社会和历史条件的产物。美的标准和价值观念受到文化和社会的影响。例如，同一个作品在不同的文化和历史背景下被认为有不同的美感。第三，美是情感的体现。美是基于情感的，通过情感才能体验到美。不同人的情感和经历不同，所以对于同一个事物的美的感受也会不同。第四，美本质是主观的价值判断。美本质是一种价值判断，而价值本身就是主观的，每个人对美本质的价值观念不同，因此不能有一个客观的美的标准。综上所述，美学界的主观本质论认为，美本质是一种个人主观感受。

在此请注意不要把科学美学与科学性美学混为一谈。科学美学不同于本书本多媒体作者华远的以四维多层多线一元为大框架的科学性美学，科学性美学是以自然、社会和人性三大块以及它们三者之间关系的良性循环、信息中介为研究对象的一门理性的社会科学，至于科学美学的分析和界定具体请参看其他小论文的论述和概括。中国社科院的徐碧辉老师在中华美学学会举办的《2022年年会暨当代中国美学的创新之路全国学术研讨会》中提出了如下一些观点∶反本质主义本身是一种开放性的思潮它并不是意味着取消人的本质、美的本质这类问题，它所反对的只是抽象不变的本质观。事情没有所谓永恒不变的本质，却有相对稳定的一定范围的本质。因此，美的本质仍是可以探讨、言说的，并不存在的超越时代和历史的抽象的美的本质。美是人所据以改造世界的一种自由形式，它既有相对固定的哲学界定，同时这种自由的形式又随着时代的不同而有着不同的内涵。在后工业时代，美的本质不再仅仅是传统马克思主义所讲的自然化和自然的本真化 。而建基于人的自然化基础上的美的形态也不再是单纯的自然美和社会美，而是涵融着自然美和社会美的生态美。马克思的美的本质的规律论与反美的抽象论是有矛盾的，这与美学界的一些过于“主体性”过于“行而上”的倾向有关。本书本多媒体作者认为，科学性美本质论的时空定位参照观实质上也是相对应于审美实践的抽象性，这一个时空定位观对实践美论的兼容，也是实践论美学之所以在美学界难以被推翻，难以被替代，难以被兼容的理路之所在。实践美论只是美本质论的一种，而不是全部，它是必要的但不是充分的。高建平教授在2022年7月3日《中华美学学会青年美学学术委员会新一届理事成立大会》的致辞中有这样的观点，他认为不要强化学派之争，要以问题为中心解决问题才是关键，同时他认为派别之争也有一些层面好处，比如说可相互借鉴，其中只要不是为派别而派别就可以了。

总之，正确的美本质观应该是四维多层多线一元的结构，以上就是作者对“三大类”、“五大派”相关统一问题的介绍。

作者为华远

作于1995年5月

Aesthetics cartoonist A——A Nobel Prize winner whose achievements reveal the objective nature of beauty

Maybe it's the unintentional focus of the world,

Because he was born to reveal the mystery of human antiquity.

Human nature is not lofty but natural (animal natural form),

The difference between animals and people is ridiculous, but it is necessary (balance artificial form),

Under the reference of benign cycle of space-time positioning, the information intermediary of unity of opposites between integrity and conciseness is the essence of beauty B，it’s to draw a circle (Hua yuan).

He was brave, but more timid, though scientific,

But also want to get the irrational balance, because he is not a beautiful man.

So he would just say, "I thought of it, I only thought of..."

I think of the legendary dispute between Kong Ming and Zhou Yu;

Think of the beauty of today's clothing and ethics;

Think of the origin of human war and green peace;

It also thinks of the gray progress of human beings and the self alienation of human beings;

Even more think of the instinct of flying in the colorful flowers C will only buzz the bees.

Written in May 1995

The author is Hua Yuan

Note and explanation:

A.Aesthetic Cartoonistst: This manuscript, in the form of "doggerel", expresses the core point of the ultimate revelation of the essence of beauty, and also explains the embarrassment and hardship encountered in the process of revealing the essence of beauty. In 1989, Hua Yuan, the author of this poem, began to mail the manuscripts and related materials related to the study of the essence of beauty to relevant experts, scholars and political celebrities at home and abroad. Now, the copies of this manuscript and all relevant materials are still well preserved, including the handwritten manuscript and related correspondence letters of the project. This poem was written in May 1995, when the environmental ecological aesthetics appeared. The appearance of environmental ecological aesthetics in the 1990s also marks the departure of human absolute centralism.

B.The essence of beauty: the concept of beauty and the essence of beauty are the combination of three definiteness and six in one, the synthesis of six key words of "time and space positioning", "virtuous cycle", "integrity", "simplicity", "information" and "intermediary". Without any restriction and reference of the above six keywords, it will be difficult to judge the beauty or ugliness of things, because the relationship between the six keywords is multiplication. "Virtuous circle" is not equal to "". The focus of virtuous circle focuses on the word "cycle". Compared with it, virtuous circle has more systematic and long-term meaning. It is similar to the field of vision outside the cross seen in shooting and aiming. It is a key link in the "positioning", "qualitative" and "quantitative" in the judgment of beauty of things .

C. Colorful Flowers: can you say that the natural colorful flowers are not beautiful? Why are they different in color and shape? The ultimate revelation of the essence of beauty is not only to study human beings and human society, including arts in the broad and narrow sense of human society, but also tilt the focus of research to the depths of nature.

D.Nature d beauty: the concept of beauty and the essence of beauty is armed and six, is the "time and space" "virtuous circle" "of" integrity "" concise "," information "" intermediary " six keywords, left the above six keywords of any limit and reference, the beauty of things will be difficult to judge, because the relationship between six keywords is the multiplication relationship."Benign cycle" is not equal to "benign", the focus of virtuous cycle on the word "cycle", compared to the virtuous cycle more systemic and long-term, virtuous cycle is similar to shooting aimed to see the cross outside of vision, it is the judgment of beauty "positioning", "qualitative", "quantitative" three "qualitative" this key link.

E.colorful flowers: can you say that the natural and colorful flowers are not beautiful, why do they have different colors and different shapes? The final revelation of the essence of beauty should not only study human beings and human society, including the broad and narrow art of human society, but also deepen the research into the depths of nature.

F.Here we introduce the unification of the "three categories" and "five schools" in the American academic field: First, talk about the unification of the "three categories" of contemporary aesthetics, First, summarize the "three categories" of domestic aesthetics, The first category is philosophical aesthetics——includes life, life, ecology, physiology, psychology, existence, practice, post-practice, practicality, body, post-human, Marxism and other aesthetics, Among them, the representative figures of philosophical aesthetics are Li Zehou, Jiang Kongyang, Zhou Laixiang, Pan Zhichang, Zhu Liyuan, Ruxin, Liu Yuedi, Zeng Fanren and so on.; The second category is literary and art aesthetics——including images, environment, images, realm, rhetorical language and other aesthetics, The first mention of the concept of literary aesthetics is Mr.Wang Mengou, Li Changzhi, Hu Jingzhi, Among them, the representative figures of literary aesthetics are Wang Guowei, Cai Yi, Wang Chaowen, Zhu Guangqian, Zong Baihua, Ye Lang, Wang Yichuan, Xu Bihui, Peng Feng and etc.; The third category is science, technology and design aesthetics——including science, technology, design, business, network media and other aesthetics, Among them, Mr.Cheng Shude, Qian Mu, CAI Yi, Yang Zuolong, Xu Jimin, Li Zhihong, Liang Sicheng, Liu Guanzhong, Wang Shouzhi, Tu Tu, Hangjian, Liang Mei and so on are the representatives of science, technology and design aesthetics. This kind of three-division method is divided according to the actual aesthetic practice in our country. There are some shortcomings, but it is generally reasonable. Can the "three categories" of aesthetics be unified? This division is not only applicable to China. Although there are different levels of foreign situations, the overall framework is much the same, because the aesthetic discipline of human society that has entered the information age has become a global humanities science. Positioning broad art level "three categories" aesthetic itself is scientific beauty research object or a broad kind of art of aesthetic object, is also a kind of discipline level orientation and order reference, the "three categories" aesthetic scientific beauty grasp is to follow the real scientific aesthetic beauty orientation, qualitative, quantitative the three pattern to evaluate to judge. Huayuan scientific aesthetics think only truly grasp the essence of the essence of beauty, found the aesthetic object, beauty and beauty and related "three categories" aesthetic "birthplace", don't forget the specific aesthetic characteristics, save differences, the above "three categories" method can be unified under the banner of real scientific aesthetics, such beauty, aesthetic road will be more walk more broad.Although western medicine has local grasp and precise treatment methods, traditional Chinese medicine also has the advantages of overall grasp and balanced conditioning. Aesthetic discipline since the 19th century divergent research is necessary, the problem is that in recent years, aesthetic regression and high level synthesis perhaps more important, aesthetics like other scientific research, points to points, to close, this is we often say research analysis and synthesis, this is also the science on the basis ofification of empirical and inference. Here we should emphasize that the unutilitarian utilitarianism has the tendency of spiritual civilization, and a clear utilitarianism is the tendency of material civilization. There is no aimless or unutilitarian things in the world, only the purpose and utilitarian things under the distinction between spirit and material. Philosophy aesthetics has the tendency of reflection, selectivity and guidance, literary and artistic aesthetics has the tendency of the subject ality, aesthetic transcendence and spiritual civilization, and science, science and technology and design aesthetics has the tendency of object rationality, frame ontology and material civilization. Scientific aesthetic beauty is for the above "three categories" of bottom-up synthesis and experience level of abstract, scientific beauty essence theory of the philosophy aesthetics, literary aesthetics, science and technology design aesthetics, the three categories about the nature of the nature of the red revolution generalized art artificial rational beauty, blue narrow art artificial perceptual beauty and green humanities natural beauty of three art practice exploration experience about the nature of beauty."Rare confused" is also want to be divided into two to see? We do not object that some places are rare to be confused, we are not opposed to the beautiful things, aesthetic objects, beauty nature and beauty, subjective and objective and so on are all rarely confused. Aesthetic feeling corresponds to value, and value and beauty are looking for the essence of beauty, beautiful things and aesthetic objects. Existing, one-sided to aesthetic psychological research aesthetics is lead to aesthetic phenomenon, aesthetic practice is difficult to scientific grasp and mass media often say the art is more and more "ugly", popular aesthetics is also beautify the human material and human spiritual life science, forget the material aesthetic object, beautiful things like the most fundamental goal of this foundation, aesthetics and what social value and meaning? Even the beauty at the level of life can beified into the category of natural beauty. Life is a natural part of life and also a part of material civilization.

Let's talk about the unification of the " five schools, The information theory, proposed by Shannon, the representative of the old three theory, can sometimes be compared to the somewhat mechanical CAI Yi's typical theory in aesthetics, Put the uninterrupted, There are countless subtle brightness or grade changes of the fine tuning switch into either 1 or 0 on and off, Too few typical grades associated with information theory, Concrete, pertinence and precision, Besides, some concepts of "honor and disgrace concept" and "aesthetic view" are the typical beauty theory represented by CAI Yi that is difficult to be compatible and benign, But it's running in broad ads, big event, Public opinion propaganda is a very practical methodology. A friend on the Internet roughly read the author's new media after several articles to think that this is Cai Yi's aesthetic theory. CAI Yi's view is not correct, his view is mechanical materialism. Book multimedia author is this answer: scientific aesthetic theory of keywords "space and time positioning" can be located to the main body, object, unity, whole, local and spiritual and material four dimensional multilayer lines of aesthetic practice, scientific aesthetic theory of landing word is positioning, qualitative, quantitative premise of information intermediary, information intermediary also contains can go deep into the brain of the people's thinking, feeling and experience the biological electricity as the carrier of the spirit of information intermediary. Such as literary aesthetics emphasize "intention" is included, can only locate to the human brain internal form level, gestalt psychology or gestalt psychology and scientific beauty theory of quantitative level of integrity and simplicity of information mediation of quantitative standard regularity is consistent, it also in turn proves the scientific beauty theory in the aesthetic psychological level has the corresponding force and compatibility, also proved that it in the rationality of aesthetic psychological level, correctness. CAI Yi's typical beauty theory has some mechanical aspects, but in contrast, his theoretical basis is correct, and his rational path has its merits. Besides Zhu Guangqian professor of some labels of unified beauty is worth we again out, Chinese aesthetics five sent only unite around the scientific aesthetics, to make our Chinese aesthetics, with the existence of science, logic, the existence of the natural intuition in the world, based on the practice and theory of scientific beauty theory to the world, contribution to all mankind. The beauty concept of "three decisions and six integration" is compatible with and beyond the five schools of modern and contemporary scholars, including foreign countries, including Zhu Guangqian's unity of subject and guest theory, Li Zehou's practice theory, Goltai's subjective theory, Pan Zhichang's theory of life theory, and CAI Yi's typical theory.

In fact, the subjective theorists of the nature of beauty also have their own relative reasons, although not quite comprehensive and overall. The subjective essence of beauty scholars holds that beauty is a subjective feeling, and there is no objective essence of beauty. The reasons include: First, beauty is a personal subjective feeling. The experience of beauty is because of our feelings of things, and these feelings vary from person to person, so the essence of beauty is not an objective existence, but a subjective experience that varies from person to person. Second, beauty is the product of cultural, social, and historical conditions. The standards and values of beauty are influenced by the culture and the society. For example, the same work is considered to have a different aesthetic feeling in different cultural and historical contexts. Third, beauty is the embodiment of emotion. Beauty is based on emotion, and beauty can only be experienced through emotion. Different people have different feelings and experiences, so the feelings of the beauty of the same thing will be different. Fourth, the essence of beauty is a subjective value judgment. The essence of beauty is a kind of value judgment, and the value itself is subjective. Everyone has different values of the essence of beauty, so there cannot be an objective standard of beauty. To sum up, the subjective essence of the beauty field believes that the essence of beauty is a kind of personal subjective feeling.

Here, please be careful not to confuse scientific aesthetics with scientific aesthetics. Scientific aesthetics is different from the book multimedia author China far with four dimensional multilayer line one yuan for the framework of scientific aesthetics, scientific aesthetics is in nature, society and human nature three blocks and the relationship between them, information intermediary as the research object of a rational social science, as for the analysis of scientific aesthetics and define specific please see other small paper and generalization. Xu Bihui teacher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in the Chinese aesthetic society of the 2022 annual meeting and the innovation of contemporary Chinese aesthetics national academic seminar put forward some ideas: essentiitself is a kind of open trend it does not mean to cancel the nature, the nature of beauty this kind of problem, it is against the essence of the abstract. Things have no eternal essence, but a relatively stable certain range. Therefore, the essence of beauty is still explored and spoken, and there is no abstract essence of beauty that goes beyond The Times and history. Beauty is a free form of transforming the world. It has a relatively fixed philosophical definition, and this form of freedom has different connotations with different times. In the post-industrial era, the essence of beauty is no longer just the naturalization and the natural nature of the traditional Marxism. The form of beauty based on the naturalization of people is no longer the pure natural beauty and social beauty, but the ecological beauty of natural beauty and social beauty. The law theory of Marx's essence of beauty is contradictory with the abstract theory of anti-beauty, which is related to the tendency of too "subjectivity" and "action up" in the beauty circle. According to the multimedia author of this book, the space-temporal positioning reference view of scientific beauty essence theory is essentially corresponding to the abstraction of aesthetic practice. The compatibility of this space-temporal positioning view to the practical beauty theory, which is also the reason why practical aesthetics is difficult to be overturned, replaced and compatible in the beauty circle. The theory of practical beauty is only one, not the whole, of the essence of beauty. It is necessary but not sufficient. Professor jianping on July 3,2022, the Chinese aesthetic society youth aesthetics academic committee of the new conference speech with such views, he thinks don't strengthen school, centered to solve the problem is the key, at the same time, he thinks the factions also has some level benefits, for example can learn from each other, as long as it is not for the factions.

In short, the correct view of the essence of beauty should be the structure of four dimensions, multiple layers, many lines and one yuan. The above is the author's introduction of the relevant unified problems of the "three categories" and the "five schools".

Written in May 1995

The author is Hua Yuan